Did Elon Musk Just Successfully Execute a Coup of the American Government?
Risk Assessment: Potential Illicit or Damaging Actions Musk Could Take with Access to the U.S. Treasury Payment System and Government Infrastructure
🤯 Cheryl.wTf 🍴 | 🔔 Subscribe | | 📖 Shop Books | 👕 Shop Merch
What We Know for a Fact Elon Musk has Done, So Far
Elon Musk, appointed by President Trump to lead the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has gained access to the U.S. Treasury Department's payment system, which processes over $6 trillion annually and contains personal information of millions of Americans. This move followed the departure of senior Treasury official David Lebryk, who resisted granting such access. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent eventually approved DOGE's entry into the system. Musk has claimed, without evidence, that Treasury officials were approving payments to fraudulent or terrorist groups. This development has raised concerns among lawmakers about potential political interference and risks to the economy
Additionally, Musk's associates have been installed in key federal agencies, such as the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and the General Services Administration (GSA). At OPM, they have implemented a "deferred resignation" program, offering federal employees the option to resign effective September 30, 2025, while continuing to receive pay and benefits until that date. This initiative has led to significant internal disruptions and concerns among federal employees.
These actions reflect a broader strategy by Musk and his team to streamline government operations, but they have also sparked debates over the appropriate role of private individuals in federal decision-making and the potential implications for government transparency and accountability.
The Corporate Coup: How Musk-Backed Insiders Could Be Reshaping America As We Watch
Given Elon Musk’s proteges gaining access to U.S. government systems, particularly the Treasury Department’s payment system, and other agencies such as the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and General Services Administration (GSA), there are several potential illegal or damaging activities that could arise from this access.
Below is an extrapolated risk assessment based on what could be theoretically done with this access:
1. Unauthorized Financial Manipulation or Fraudulent Payments
Risk: Given the Treasury’s payment system processes over $6 trillion annually, there is a significant risk that individuals with improper intentions could misdirect or alter payments, funneling funds to fraudulent entities or causes.
Possible Actions:
Diverting Government Funds
Redirecting funds (such as social security, Medicare, or military salaries) to private entities, shell companies, or international accounts controlled by associates of Musk.
Reallocating federal funds to different government agencies or even Musk-owned companies under the guise of "government efficiency."
Targeted Freezing or Delays in Payments
Delaying or selectively withholding payments to states, agencies, or programs Musk politically opposes.
Creating artificial financial crises by disrupting essential government payouts.
Market Manipulation
Using insider knowledge of Treasury transactions to influence financial markets.
Timing federal payments (or lack thereof) to benefit companies he holds stock in.
Printing Digital Money Without Oversight
Issuing unauthorized federal payments or bonds, inflating the money supply, and causing economic instability.
Impact: This could lead to massive financial fraud, loss of public funds, or support for terrorist organizations, which would severely damage the economy and U.S. financial integrity.
2. Political Influence, Retaliation and Corruption
Risk: Musk or his proteges could use access to financial and personnel data to exert influence over political decisions or candidates.
Possible Actions:
Weaponizing Treasury Payments Against Opponents
Using Treasury or other financial data to manipulate political donations, gain insider information, or influence elections by targeting key swing states or political races with financial incentives.
Cutting off federal funding to blue states, liberal cities, or agencies that resist his influence.
Prioritizing federal grants and contracts for allies and punishing competitors.
Withholding Disaster Relief or Essential Payments
Delaying FEMA or emergency funding to areas based on political leanings.
Cutting funding for programs like food stamps (SNAP) or public healthcare to push privatization.
Bribery & Self-Enrichment
Using government payments as leverage to force companies or individuals into business deals benefiting him or his associates.
Creating a shadow network of federal contracts that funnel money into SpaceX, Tesla, or other Musk-owned ventures.
Impact: This would undermine democratic processes, lead to an unfair advantage for certain political groups, and reduce trust in the government’s ability to act impartially.
3. Data Exploitation, Exposure & Manipulation Creating National Security Risks and Personal Retaliation
Risk: Access to government payment systems and personnel management databases like OPM puts private citizens, government employees and national at risk of having personal, professional, financial and classified data exposed.
Possible Actions:
Access to Confidential Financial Data
Gaining insight into classified financial transactions, defense budgets, and economic strategies.
Using this data for personal gain or to benefit his corporate interests
Selling or Leaking Sensitive Data
Providing foreign governments or private entities with classified Treasury and Personnel insights.
Exposing personal financial records of political enemies or critics.
Stealing and selling personal data, or using this information for blackmail, identity theft, or corporate espionage.
Compromising the Federal Reserve & Inflation Control
Interfering with Treasury bonds or Federal Reserve actions to benefit his investments.
Using access to financial systems to predict and front-run market shifts.
Meddling Directly in the US Military
Diverting military or intelligence-related funds to unauthorized purposes, modifying classified spending, or sabotaging critical national infrastructure through budget allocation manipulation.
Exposing personal data of civilian personnel with military ties.
Impact:
This could lead to mass identity theft, privacy violations, and major cybersecurity breaches affecting millions of Americans.
Additionally, government employees' private information could be weaponized to force political compliance or undermine federal institutions.
National security could be compromised by deprioritizing funding to essential defense, intelligence, or emergency services, leaving the U.S. vulnerable to external threats, terrorism, or cyber-attacks.
4. Federal Infrastructure Sabotage & Privatization
Risk: Disruption in federal employee functions.
Possible Actions:
Disrupting the Federal Workforce
Continuing the "deferred resignation" program, leading to mass federal employee departures and government dysfunction.
Further reducing federal employee capacity by undermining personnel management, purging key personnel, or exploiting personnel data for political loyalty testing.
Replacing experienced personnel with unqualified loyalists who accelerate inefficiency rather than fix it.
Shutting Down Government Services
Cutting payments to departments he deems “inefficient,” leading to loss of critical government functions.
Pushing for mass privatization of public services, benefitting corporations, likely owned by Musk, while raising costs for citizens.
AI-Controlled Treasury & Automated Decision-Making
Replacing financial regulators with AI algorithms (potentially, purposefully biased) controlled by Musk and his team.
Automating financial decisions in a way that prioritizes efficiency over ethical and legal considerations.
Impact: This could create chaos in government operations, degrade public services, and lead to widespread employee dissatisfaction or strikes, destabilizing essential public sector services.
5. Creating a ‘Shadow Government’ of Personal Interests
Risk: Given Musk’s extensive private business interests, there is the potential for the creation of a shadow government where decisions are influenced not by the public interest, but by corporate profits and personal benefits.
Possible Actions:
Money Laundering & Off-Books Transactions
Using Treasury systems to launder money for private entities or politically aligned figures.
Hiding illicit transactions by classifying them under ambiguous government expenditures.
Using access to government systems to prioritize policies and contracts that benefit Musk’s companies (e.g., Tesla, SpaceX) or other ventures, regardless of their public or legal implications.
Facilitating Foreign Interference
Allowing or assisting foreign actors in accessing Treasury systems for cyberattacks or economic espionage.
Disrupting sanctions enforcement, enabling hostile nations or organizations to bypass restrictions.
Creating ‘Shadow Funds’
Establishing untraceable government slush funds to finance off-the-books projects.
Directing funds to groups that align with his ideological or corporate interests.
Enabling or Covering Up Crimes
Using access to government systems to cover up crimes and interfere with investigations
Impact: This could lead to cronyism, corruption, and government policies being made to benefit private individuals rather than the broader public, eroding trust in democratic governance and transparency.
6. Destabilizing the Economy Through Reckless Budgetary Decisions
Risk: With access to the Treasury’s payment systems and potentially large financial reserves, Musk’s team could make reckless or ideologically-driven economic decisions.
Possible Actions: Allocating funds to experimental or high-risk ventures that may benefit Musk’s businesses but destabilize the public finances (e.g., reckless investments in unproven technologies or companies).
Impact: This could result in economic instability, public debt spikes, and a diversion of taxpayer funds from essential government functions like healthcare, education, and infrastructure to unproven or inefficient projects.
7. Unilateral Control Over Government Transparency and Accountability
Risk: By controlling access to critical government systems, Musk could centralize decision-making processes, bypassing traditional checks and balances in the U.S. government.
Possible Actions: Unilaterally changing key government policies or budgets without congressional oversight, potentially obstructing investigations or audits that could uncover misuse of public funds or corruption.
Impact: This would erode transparency, reduce accountability, and undermine democratic oversight, leading to a concentration of power in unaccountable hands.
8. Infiltrating and Sabotaging Other Federal Agencies
Risk: Having access to Treasury systems and federal employee data could allow Musk’s team to infiltrate and control other key government agencies, further consolidating power.
Possible Actions: Installing loyalists in agencies that oversee trade, healthcare, or communications, which could steer key policies toward Musk’s business interests or personal beliefs, undermining the public sector.
Impact: This could weaken the core functions of federal institutions and distort policy-making processes, limiting public input and ensuring that decisions disproportionately benefit the few rather than the many.
9. Creating a Backdoor for Foreign Influence
Risk: Given Musk’s international business ventures, foreign entities could exploit this situation to exert influence over U.S. government actions.
Possible Actions: Using Musk’s access to government systems as a conduit for foreign governments (e.g., Russia, China) to gain insights into U.S. financial data, military budgets, or key national security secrets.
Impact: Foreign interference could undermine U.S. sovereignty, national security, and geopolitical stability, potentially leading to international crises or diplomatic fallout.
Conclusion? We're Forked 🍴
The access granted to Elon Musk’s proteges presents numerous risks, including potential financial mismanagement, political manipulation, national security threats, and the erosion of democratic processes. While Musk’s team may argue these measures are in the name of “efficiency,” they open up a wide range of possibilities for unethical, illegal, and highly damaging actions that could have far-reaching consequences for the American people and the global order. As such, this situation warrants immediate and thorough scrutiny to prevent exploitation and ensure that the rights and welfare of citizens are not compromised for personal, corporate, foreign or political gain.
Urgency Level: 🤯Critical🤯
The unchecked power he wields could be exploited for personal enrichment, political retaliation, or systemic disruption.
Given Musk’s history of unpredictability, personal feuds, and disdain for regulatory oversight, there is a high probability that some or all of these risks could materialize if strict checks and balances are not enforced.
If you love my writing, get value out of it, and believe in paying people for their work, please consider a paid subscription so that I can continue to share my stories.
I’m just a left handed girl in a right handed world trying to figure out
“What the Fork🍴?!?” is going on ~ 🤯 Cheryl.wTf 🍴
🔔 More from me…
🪄 Magically Thriving Business | 🐐 Wicked Real Estate | 🌈 Go on a Side Quest
Sources:
https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/31/politics/doge-treasury-department-federal-spending/index.html
DISCLAIMER
Some outbound links may financially benefit me and the page through affiliate programs. The affiliate relationship doesn’t influence my opinion, and I would never endorse programs, products, or services I didn’t use, approve of or feel familiar with. So If you use it, I will get compensated — but there’s no additional cost to you.